4.6 Review

The Predictive Power of Exact Constraints and Appropriate Norms in Density Functional Theory

期刊

ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 74, 期 -, 页码 193-218

出版社

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-062422-013259

关键词

density functional theory; electronic structure; exact constraints; appropriate norms; exchange-correlation energy; density functionals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ground-state Kohn-Sham density functional theory provides the exact ground-state energy and electronic spin densities of interacting electrons in an external potential. Approximations for the exchange-correlation energy are necessary in practice. This work reviews known mathematical properties of the exact exchange-correlation functional and discusses the implications for density functional approximations. The study suggests that more accurate constraints and fitting to bonded systems can improve the predictive power of functionals.
Ground-state Kohn-Sham density functional theory provides, in principle, the exact ground-state energy and electronic spin densities of real interacting electrons in a static external potential. In practice, the exact density functional for the exchange-correlation (xc) energy must be approximated in a computationally efficient way. About 20 mathematical properties of the exact xc functional are known. In this work, we review and discuss these known constraints on the xc energy and hole. By analyzing a sequence of increasingly sophisticated density functional approximations (DFAs), we argue that (a) the satisfaction of more exact constraints and appropriate norms makes a functional more predictive over the immense space of many-electron systems and (b) fitting to bonded systems yields an interpolative DFA that may not extrapolate well to systems unlike those in the fitting set. We discuss both how the class of well-described systems has grown along with constraint satisfaction and the possibilities for future functional development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据