4.3 Article

Clinical Outcomes of Oral Zinc Therapy in Hepatic Encephalopathy Treatment

期刊

ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 57, 期 8, 页码 899-906

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/10600280221134283

关键词

zinc; hepatic encephalopathy; cirrhosis; lactulose; rifaximin; readmission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study is the first to evaluate the use of zinc for hepatic encephalopathy treatment in the United States. The results show that zinc does not impact the 30-day and 1-year all-cause readmission rates in patients. Further research is needed to assess the potential benefits of zinc for hepatic encephalopathy treatment.
Background: Additional therapies for hepatic encephalopathy (HE) treatment are warranted. There are data evaluating the use of zinc for HE; however, clinical outcomes, specifically in the United States, are unknown. Objective: To compare 30-day and 1-year all-cause readmission rates in patients with cirrhosis complicated by HE on lactulose and rifaximin to those on lactulose, rifaximin, and zinc. Methods: This retrospective study included patients admitted with documented cirrhosis and home medications of lactulose and rifaximin, with or without zinc. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: those receiving lactulose and rifaximin for HE (control) and those receiving lactulose, rifaximin, and zinc for HE (treatment). The primary outcomes were 30-day and 1-year all-cause readmission rates. Results: One-hundred fifty-seven patients were included (102 in control group, 55 in treatment group). Regarding 30-day and 1-year all-cause readmission rates, there was no difference between the control and treatment groups. Conclusion and Relevance: This is the first study conducted in the United States evaluating zinc for HE treatment. Zinc did not impact 30-day or 1-year all-cause readmission rates. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the potential benefit of zinc for HE, possibly in correlation with Model for End-stage Liver Disease-Sodium (MELD-Na) scores.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据