Effects of different distalization directions and methods on maxillary total distalization with clear aligners: a finite element study

Objectives: To analyze the effects of maxillary tooth distalization by clear aligner (CA) treatment with variations in the angular direction of the distalization force, presence of attachments, and force -application method used.Materials and Methods: A finite element model containing alveolar bone, dentition, and periodontal ligament was constructed. Analytical model groups were as follows: (1) distalization with buttons (without attachments), (2) buttons on canines (with attachments), (3) precision cuts on the canines (without attachments), and (4) precision cuts on the canines (with attachments). A distalization force of 1.5 N was applied to the button or precision cut at-30 degrees,-20 degrees,-10 degrees, 0 degrees, 10 degrees, 20 degrees, and 30 degrees to the occlusal plane.Results: As the direction of force approached +30 degrees, the dentition inclined posteriorly. The posterior movement pattern was significantly influenced by the presence of an attachment and the direction of force, rather than the area where the force was applied. Distal inclination was dramatically reduced with attachments. A disengagement or deformation of the CA may reduce the distalization efficiency of the dentition or move the dentition in an inappropriate direction.Conclusions: Attachments for efficient distalization by the CA are necessary. The use of miniscrews in the direction of force parallel to the occlusal plane is more advantageous than the use of Class II elastics. Due to CA deformation, distalization with the button on the canines can be more effective for distal movement of the maxillary dentition. (Angle Orthod. 2023;93:348-356.)

Automated summary

This study analyzed the effects of maxillary tooth distalization by clear aligner (CA) treatment, focusing on variations in the angular direction of the distalization force, presence of attachments, and force-application method used. The results showed that the direction of force and the presence of attachments significantly influenced the posterior movement pattern of the dentition. Attachments were found to be necessary for efficient distalization, and a force direction parallel to the occlusal plane was more advantageous than using Class II elastics. It was also suggested that using buttons on the canines may be more effective due to CA deformation.