4.8 Article

17O Hyperfine Spectroscopy Reveals Hydration Structure of Nitroxide Radicals in Aqueous Solutions

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202213700

关键词

EPR Spectroscopy; Hydrogen Bonds; Hyperfine Spectroscopy; O-17; Radicals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hydration structure of nitroxide radicals in aqueous solutions is studied using advanced O-17 hyperfine (hf) spectroscopy, quantum chemical calculations, and MD simulations. Two different nitroxide radicals with piperidine and pyrrolidine-based groups are compared, revealing distinct differences in the preferred direction of H-bond formation. The O-17 hf spectra provide the best representation of these scenarios, showing that in-plane coordination leads to little spin density transfer and small hf couplings, while perpendicular coordination generates larger hf couplings. The quantitative analysis based on MD simulations and DFT predicted hf parameters confirms a distribution of solvating water molecules, where directionality is influenced by steric effects.
The hydration structure of nitroxide radicals in aqueous solutions is elucidated by advanced O-17 hyperfine (hf) spectroscopy with support of quantum chemical calculations and MD simulations. A piperidine and a pyrrolidine-based nitroxide radical are compared and show clear differences in the preferred directionality of H-bond formation. We demonstrate that these scenarios are best represented in O-17 hf spectra, where in-plane coordination over sigma ${\sigma }$ -type H-bonding leads to little spin density transfer on the water oxygen and small hf couplings, whereas pi ${{\rm \pi }}$ -type perpendicular coordination generates much larger hf couplings. Quantitative analysis of the spectra based on MD simulations and DFT predicted hf parameters is consistent with a distribution of close solvating water molecules, in which directionality is influenced by subtle steric effects of the ring and the methyl group substituents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据