4.8 Article

Diboron(4)-Catalyzed Remote [3+2] Cycloaddition of Cyclopropanes via Dearomative/Rearomative Radical Transmission through Pyridine

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202214507

关键词

Boron Catalysis; Cycloaddition; Metal-Free; Pyridine; Radical Transmission

资金

  1. NSFC
  2. Natural Science Basic Research Plan of Shaanxi Province
  3. [21971202]
  4. [22171218]
  5. [2020JC-08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a novel method for selective activation of a remote bond using a through-(hetero)arene radical transmission concept. By a metal-free [3+2] cycloaddition reaction, pyridine-substituted cyclopentanes, cyclopentenes, and bicyclo[2.1.1]hexanes that are difficult to access using known methods were synthesized. The reaction was catalyzed by a simple and inexpensive diboron(4) compound and proceeded via dearomative/rearomative processes.
Ring structures such as pyridine, cyclopentane or their combinations are important motifs in bioactive molecules. In contrast to previous cycloaddition reactions that necessitated a directly bonded initiating functional group, this work demonstrated a novel through-(hetero)arene radical transmission concept for selective activation of a remote bond. An efficient, metal-free and atom-economical [3+2] cycloaddition between 4-pyridinyl cyclopropanes and alkenes or alkynes has been developed for modular synthesis of pyridine-substituted cyclopentanes, cyclopentenes and bicyclo[2.1.1]hexanes that are difficult to access using known methods. This complexity-building reaction was catalyzed by a very simple and inexpensive diboron(4) compound and took place via dearomative/rearomative processes. The substrate scope was broad and more than 100 new compounds were prepared in generally high yields. Mechanistic experiments and density function theory (DFT) investigation supported a radical relay catalytic cycle involving alkylidene dihydropyridine radical intermediates and boronyl radical transfer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据