4.7 Article

Efficacy of glatiramer acetate in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a multicenter retrospective study

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
卷 263, 期 3, 页码 575-582

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-015-7991-1

关键词

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder; Devic's disease; Glatiramer acetate; Aquaporin-4 antibody; Optic neuritis; Myelitis

资金

  1. International Headache Society
  2. German Research Foundation
  3. Biogen Idec
  4. Bayer
  5. Teva
  6. Merck
  7. Novartis
  8. Genzyme
  9. Bayer Healthcare
  10. Chugai
  11. Merck Serono
  12. German Science Foundation (DFG)
  13. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, EDEN/EU-FP7)
  14. Bayer-Schering AG
  15. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF/KKNMS, Competence Network Multiple Sclerosis)
  16. Novartis Pharmaceuticals
  17. European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS)
  18. Sanofi Company
  19. Guthy Jackson Charitable Foundation
  20. MERCUR Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glatiramer acetate (GA) is an approved therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, but its efficacy for the prevention of attacks in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) remains unknown. We did a multicenter retrospective analysis of GA-treated patients with NMOSD, identified through a national registry. Annualized relapse rate and expanded disability status scale (EDSS) were the main outcome measures. We identified 23 GA-treated patients (21 female, 16 aquaporin-4 antibody-positive). GA was given for < 6 months in seven patients; reasons for stopping were relapses (n = 3), confirmation of NMOSD (n = 2) and side effects (n = 2). Of 16 patients treated a parts per thousand yen6 months with GA (15 female, 11 aquaporin-4 antibody-positive), 14 experienced at least one relapse. There was no reduction in the mean annualized relapse rate in the total group (1.9 +/- A 1.1 before vs. 1.8 +/- A 1.4 during GA therapy), as well as in those patients who were aquaporin-4 antibody-positive, or had a history of prior immunotherapy or not. The median EDSS increased (2.5 start vs. 3.5 finish of GA, P < 0.05). GA therapy was discontinued in 15/16 patients; reasons were therapeutic inefficacy in 13 and post-injection skin reactions in two patients. We conclude that GA is not beneficial for preventing attacks in most patients with NMOSD, particularly in aquaporin-4 antibody-positive cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据