4.8 Article

Plasmon-Enhanced Electrochemiluminescence at the Single-Nanoparticle Level

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202214103

关键词

Electochemiluminescence; Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance; Microscopy; Nanoparticles; Single-Particle Detection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plasmon-enhanced electrochemiluminescence (ECL) at the single-nanoparticle (NP) level was investigated using ECL microscopy. An ordered array of gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) was used, allowing for high-throughput characterization and a strong dependence of ECL intensity on Au NP configurations was observed. It was demonstrated that small Au NPs (<40nm) quenched the ECL of Ru(bpy)(3)(2+)-TPrA, while large Au NPs (>80nm) enhanced it due to localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR). The coupling effect of neighboring Au NPs further increased the ECL intensity. The results were supported by Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) simulations. This plasmon-enhanced ECL microscopy provides a reliable tool for screening electrocatalytic activity at the single-particle level.
Plasmon-enhanced electrochemiluminescence (ECL) at the single-nanoparticle (NP) level was investigated by ECL microscopy. The Au NPs were assembled into an ordered array, providing a high-throughput platform that can easily locate each NP in sequential characterizations. A strong dependence of ECL intensity on Au NP configurations was observed. We demonstrate for the first time that at the single-particle level, the ECL of Ru(bpy)(3)(2+)-TPrA was majorly quenched by small Au NPs (<40nm), while enhanced by large Au ones (>80nm) due to the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR). Notably, the ECL intensity was further increased by the coupling effect of neighboring Au NPs. Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) simulations conformed well with the experimental results. This plasmon enhanced ECL microscopy for arrayed single NPs provides a reliable tool for screening electrocatalytic activity at a single particle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据