4.2 Article

Arterial circle of the brain in the common wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus)

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ar.25134

关键词

cerebral arteries; neuroanatomy; rostral epidural rete mirabile

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aims to analyze the structure of the arterial circle of the brain and rostral epidural rete mirabile in the common wildebeest. The arterial circle of the brain in the wildebeest is heart-shaped and consists of bilateral rostral cerebral arteries, caudal communicating arteries, and the basilar artery. This structure plays a role in protecting the brain from hyperthermia and regulating body water balance.
The main aim of this study was to analyze the arterial circle of the brain and rostral epidural rete mirabile in specimens of the common wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus). The arterial circle of the brain is a circulatory anastomosis that supplies blood to particular lobes of the brain and surrounding structures. The study was conducted on male and female adults (n = 12) by bilateral injection of an acetone solution of vinyl superchloride or latex LBS3060, which resulted in a cast of arteries of the head and encephalic base. We describe the exact structure of the arterial circle of the brain and rostral epidural rete mirabile. The shape of the arterial circle of the brain in the common wildebeest is heart-shaped, as in other Bovidae. It is formed by bilateral rostral cerebral arteries, caudal communicating arteries, and the basilar artery, with a general pattern of vessels forming and branching off from the arterial circle of the brain, as described in other ruminants. The rostral cerebral and caudal communicating arteries emerge from an intracranial segment of the internal carotid artery, which in turn arises from vessels of the rostral epidural rete mirabile. This structure, well developed in the examined individuals, has mechanisms underlying selective cooling of the brain, protecting animals from hyperthermia, and affecting body water balance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据