4.6 Article

A dual-emission ratiometric fluorescent sensor based on copper nanoclusters encapsulated in zeolitic imidazolate framework-90 for rapid detection and imaging of adenosine triphosphate

期刊

ANALYTICAL METHODS
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 788-796

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ay01932a

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this research, a dual-emission ratiometric fluorescent probe Cu NCs-Al@ZIF-90 was developed for accurate and rapid detection of ATP. The probe was synthesized by encapsulating copper nanoclusters (Cu NCs) into zeolitic imidazolate framework-90 (ZIF-90) using a simple one-pot method. The probe exhibited reverse fluorescence changes at 620 nm and 450 nm in response to ATP, allowing for efficient and rapid ATP determination with a detection limit of 0.034 mM.
Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is the primary energy carrier for intracellular metabolic processes. Accurate and rapid detection of ATP has important implications for clinical diagnosis. In this work, we reported a dual-emission ratiometric fluorescent probe Cu NCs-Al@ZIF-90 formed by encapsulating copper nanoclusters (Cu NCs) into zeolitic imidazolate framework-90 (ZIF-90) using a simple one-pot method. Cu NCs exhibited a remarkable fluorescence enhancement in the presence of aluminum ions due to the aggregation-induced emission (AIE) properties. When ATP existed, the Zn2+ nodes in the MOF material acted as selective sites for ATP recognition, resulting in the cleavage of Cu NCs-Al@ZIF-90. As a consequence, two reverse fluorescence changes were observed from released Cu NCs at 620 nm and imidazole-2-carboxaldehyde (2-ICA) at 450 nm, respectively. With the dual-emission ratiometric strategy, efficient and rapid determination of ATP was realized, giving a detection limit down to 0.034 mM in the concentration range of 0.2 mM to 0.625 mM. The convenient synthesis process and the rapid ATP-responsive ability made the proposed Cu NCs-Al@ZIF-90 probe highly promising in clinical and environmental analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据