4.8 Article

Development of Online pH Monitoring for Lactic, Malonic, Citric, and Oxalic Acids Based on Raman Spectroscopy Using Hierarchical Chemometric Modeling

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 94, 期 50, 页码 17467-17476

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c03624

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC05-76RL01830]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Online spectroscopic measurements are useful for providing unique insights into complex chemical systems, such as monitoring the pH of acid systems in real-time. This study used Raman spectroscopy to characterize acids used in various chemical separation processes and developed a consolidated model scheme to measure the pH of weak acid systems. The results showed that the Raman-based approach accurately analyzed weak acid solution pH.
Online spectroscopic measurements can be used to provide unique insight into complex chemical systems, enabling new understanding and optimization of chemical processes. A key example of this is discussed here with the monitoring of pH of various acid systems in real-time. In this work the acids used in multiple chemical separations processes, such as TALSPEAK (Trivalent Actinide-Lanthanide Separation by Phosphorus reagent Extraction from Aqueous Komplexes) and oxalate precipitation, were characterized. Raman spectroscopy, a robust optical approach that can be integrated in corrosive processes, was used to follow the unique fingerprints of the various protonated and deprotonated acid species. This data was analyzed using a hierarchical modeling approach to build a consolidated model scheme using optical fingerprints from all weak acids to measure pH associated with any of the weak acid systems studied here. Validation of system performance included utilizing Raman spectroscopy under dynamic flow conditions to monitor solution pH under changing process conditions in-line. Overall, the Raman based approach provided accurate analysis of weak acid solution pH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据