☆ 4.5 Editorial Material

Open science should be a pleonasm

ANAESTHESIA (2023)

相关参考文献

注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Many researchers were not compliant with their published data sharing statement: a mixed-methods study

Mirko Gabelica et al.

Summary: This study analyzed the compliance of researchers with their data availability statements (DAS) in manuscripts published in open-access journals. The results suggest that even when authors indicate their willingness to share data, the actual compliance rate is the same as for authors who do not provide the DAS, indicating that the DAS may not be sufficient to ensure data sharing.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2022)

添加到收藏夹

Article Biology

Why don't we share data and code? Perceived barriers and benefits to public archiving practices

Dylan G. E. Gomes et al.

Summary: The biological sciences community recognizes the importance of open, reproducible, and transparent research practices. However, researchers face barriers in sharing their data and code, including knowledge barriers, concerns about reuse, and misaligned career incentives. By identifying and addressing these barriers, we can promote open science goals.

PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES (2022)

添加到收藏夹

Article Anesthesiology

False individual patient data and zombie randomised controlled trials submitted toAnaesthesia

J. B. Carlisle

Summary: The author analyzed the baseline summary data of randomized controlled trials submitted to Anaesthesia from 2017 to 2020, identifying 14% of trials containing false data and categorizing 8% as 'zombie'. The analysis showed that individual patient data increased detection of false data and categorization of trials as 'zombie'. China, South Korea, India, Japan, and Egypt were the top five countries submitting trials, with China having the highest proportion.

ANAESTHESIA (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Editorial Material Health Care Sciences & Services

Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic

Lonni Besancon et al.

Summary: This article discusses the accelerated adoption of open science practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting concerns about violations of open science principles and their potential impact on the quality of research output. It calls for wider adoption of open science practices and emphasizes that scientific research should always be a rigorous, reliable, and transparent process.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2021)

添加到收藏夹

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

The views, perspectives, and experiences of academic researchers with data sharing and reuse: A meta-synthesis

Laure Perrier et al.

PLOS ONE (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Review Engineering, Electrical & Electronic

Economic savings for scientific free and open source technology: A review

Joshua M. Pearce

HARDWAREX (2020)

添加到收藏夹

Review Information Science & Library Science

The Economic Impacts of Open Science: A Rapid Evidence Assessment

Michael J. Fell

PUBLICATIONS (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Article Computer Science, Information Systems

Open Science, Open Data, and Open Scholarship: European Policies to Make Science Fit for the Twenty-First Century

Jean-Claude Burgelman et al.

FRONTIERS IN BIG DATA (2019)

添加到收藏夹

Editorial Material Anesthesiology

What Anaesthesia is doing to combat scientific misconduct and investigate data fabrication and falsification

A. A. Klein

ANAESTHESIA (2017)

添加到收藏夹

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Data Sharing Statements for Clinical Trials - A Requirement of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors

Darren B. Taichman et al.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2017)

添加到收藏夹

Article Information Science & Library Science

Open Data: What It Is and Why You Should Care

Lori Bowen Ayre et al.

PUBLIC LIBRARY QUARTERLY (2017)

添加到收藏夹

Article Anesthesiology

Data fabrication and other reasons for non-random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals

J. B. Carlisle

ANAESTHESIA (2017)

添加到收藏夹

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Unlikely partnerships

Neil Savage

NATURE (2016)

添加到收藏夹

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Boldt: the great pretender

Jacqui Wise

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2013)

添加到收藏夹

Article Anesthesiology

The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity

J. B. Carlisle

ANAESTHESIA (2012)

添加到收藏夹

Article Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary

The economic implications of alternative publishing models

John Houghtona et al.

PROMETHEUS (2010)

添加到收藏夹

Editorial Material Anesthesiology

Tattered Threads

Steven L. Shafer

ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA (2009)

添加到收藏夹

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation Rate

Heather A. Piwowar et al.

PLOS ONE (2007)

添加到收藏夹

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

The dual-use dilemma for the life sciences: Perspectives, conundrums, and global solutions

Ronald M. Atlas et al.

BIOSECURITY AND BIOTERRORISM-BIODEFENSE STRATEGY PRACTICE AND SCIENCE (2006)

添加到收藏夹

© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.