4.5 Article

Serum sclerostin levels and mortality in hemodialysis patients: An 8-year prospective study

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY
卷 53, 期 11-12, 页码 767-774

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000528795

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the association between serum sclerostin levels and mortality in hemodialysis patients. The results showed that there was no significant correlation between serum sclerostin levels and mortality, even after adjusting for potential confounders. Therefore, further research is needed to determine the role of sclerostin in vascular calcification and cardiovascular disease in kidney failure.
Introduction: Sclerostin is an osteocyte-derived inhibitor of bone formation and is increased in kidney failure. Sclerostin might be involved in the pathogenesis of vascular calcification, but few studies have examined the association between sclerostin and mortality in hemodialysis patients.Methods: We analyzed a prospective cohort of 654 patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. The primary exposure variable was the baseline serum sclerostin level measured at study enrollment. The primary outcome was 8-year all-cause mortality. Mortality risk was assessed using Cox regression models adjusted for potential confounders.Results: During a median follow-up of 7.6 years (IQR, 4.1-8.0 years), 229 of the 654 participants died. In univariate analysis, serum sclerostin levels were not associated with mortality (HR per doubling, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.76-1.17). This result was unchanged after adjustment for age, sex, dialysis vintage, diabetes, prior cardiovascular disease, and, body mass index (HR per doubling, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.72-1.17). Similar results were obtained for cardiovascular mortality.Conclusion: Serum sclerostin levels were not associated with mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Further research is required to determine the role of sclerostin in vascular calcification and cardiovascular disease in kidney failure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据