4.2 Article

Tissue mosaicism, FMR1 expression and intellectual functioning in males with fragile X syndrome

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
卷 191, 期 2, 页码 357-369

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63027

关键词

DNA methylation; epigenetics; FMR1; fragile X syndrome; intellectual disability; mosaicism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found significant associations between FMR1 methylation levels in blood and buccal epithelial cells and FMR1 mRNA levels and intellectual functioning in males with FXS, with stronger relationships seen using MS-QMA compared to mSB.
Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is caused by hypermethylation of the FMR1 promoter due to the full mutation expansion (full mutation [FM]: CGG >= 200 repeats) and silencing of FMR1. Assessment of mosaicism for active-unmethylated alleles has prognostic utility. This study examined relationships between FMR1 methylation in different tissues with FMR1 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) and intellectual functioning in 87 males with FXS (1.89-43.17 years of age). Methylation sensitive Southern blot (mSB) and Methylation Specific-Quantitative Melt Aanalysis (MS-QMA) were used to examine FMR1 methylation. FMR1 mRNA levels in blood showed strong relationships with FMR1 methylation assessed using MS-QMA in blood (n = 68; R-2 = 0.597; p = 1.4 x 10(-)(10)) and buccal epithelial cells (BEC) (n = 62; R-2 = 0.24; p = 0.003), with these measures also showing relationships with intellectual functioning scores (p < 0.01). However, these relationships were not as strong for mSB, with similar to 40% of males with only FM alleles that were 100% methylated and non-mosaic by mSB, showing methylation mosaicism by MS-QMA. This was confirmed through presence of detectable levels of FMR1 mRNA in blood. In summary, FMR1 methylation levels in blood and BEC examined by MS-QMA were significantly associated with FMR1 mRNA levels and intellectual functioning in males with FXS. These relationships were not as strong for mSB, which underestimated prevalence of mosaicism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据