4.6 Article

Daratumumab Use Prior to Kidney Transplant and T Cell-Mediated Rejection: A Case Report

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
卷 81, 期 5, 页码 616-620

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.11.010

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a growing interest in the use of daratumumab for desensitization and potential treatment for antibody-mediated rejection in solid organ transplant. However, ongoing investigations have shown potential immunologic concerns with daratumumab, particularly an increase in populations of CD4-positive cytotoxic T cells and CD8-positive helper T cells that could result in acute T cell-mediated rejection. This case report presents the first documented case of early severe T-cell mediated rejection in a low-immunologic-risk living-donor kidney transplant recipient who received daratumumab for multiple myeloma maintenance prior to transplant.
There is growing interest in daratumumab in the solid organ transplant realm owing to the potential immunomodulatory effects on CD3 8-expressing cells, primarily plasma cells, as they have a key role in antibody production. In particular there is interest in use of daratumumab for desensitization and po-tential treatment for antibody-mediated rejection. However, ongoing investigation with daratumumab has shown potential immunologic concerns in vitro, with a significant increase in populations of C D4 -positive cytotoxic T cells and C D8-positive helper T cells in both peripheral blood and bone marrow that could lead to acute T cell-mediated rejection in the solid organ transplant patient. To date, there are no published reports of an association with daratumumab use and T cell-mediated rejection in vivo. In this case report we present what is to our knowledge the first documented case of an early severe T cell-mediated rejection in a low-immunologic-risk living-donor kidney transplant recipient who received daratumumab for multiple myeloma maintenance prior to transplant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据