4.3 Article

Monitoring Direct Thrombin Inhibitors With Calibrated Diluted Thrombin Time vs Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time in Pediatric Patients

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
卷 159, 期 1, 页码 60-68

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqac131

关键词

Argatroban; Bivalirudin; Direct thrombin inhibitor; Drug monitoring; Thrombin time

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The plasma diluted thrombin time (dTT) showed a more stable dose-response relationship and stronger correlation with DTI dose compared to activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in pediatric patients receiving argatroban and bivalirudin. The variation in dose-response curves was higher for argatroban compared to bivalirudin.
Objectives Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is the primary test used to monitor intravenous (IV) direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) but has many limitations. The plasma diluted thrombin time (dTT) has shown better correlation with DTI levels than aPTT. This study compared dose-response curves for dTT and aPTT in pediatric patients receiving argatroban and bivalirudin. Methods A retrospective review of pediatric patients treated with argatroban (n = 45) or bivalirudin (n = 14) monitored with dTT and aPTT. Results The dTT assay was calibrated to report DTI concentrations in mu g/mL for argatroban and bivalirudin with good analytic sensitivity and specificity. The dTT was fivefold more likely to show a stable dose-response slope than the aPTT (P < .0002; odds ratio, 4.9). For patients in whom both dTT and aPTT showed a significant correlation between dose and assay results, dTT had a higher average correlation factor compared with aPTT (P = .007). Argatroban dose-response slopes showed more inter- and intrapatient variation than bivalirudin (dose-response slope coefficient of variation, 132% vs 52%). Conclusions The dTT assay was more likely to show a stable dose response and have a stronger correlation with DTI dose than aPTT. Argatroban shows more variation in dose response than bivalirudin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据