4.7 Article

Hypertension and hyperhomocysteinemia as modifiable risk factors for Alzheimer's disease and dementia: New evidence, potential therapeutic strategies, and biomarkers

期刊

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 671-695

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/alz.12871

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; biomarkers; cardiovascular risk; cerebrovascular dysfunction; dementia; hypertension; hyperhomocysteinemia; prevention; therapeutic strategies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review provides a summary of recent evidence on the exacerbating effects of mid-life hypertension, hyperhomocysteinemia, blood pressure variability, and late-life hypotension on Alzheimer's disease and dementia risk. It also highlights potential therapeutic options and novel vascular biomarkers associated with hypertension and hyperhomocysteinemia.
This review summarizes recent evidence on how mid-life hypertension, hyperhomocysteinemia (HHcy) and blood pressure variability, as well as late-life hypotension, exacerbate Alzheimer's disease (AD) and dementia risk. Intriguingly, HHcy also increases the risk for hypertension, revealing the importance of understanding the relationship between comorbid cardiovascular risk factors. Hypertension-induced dementia presents more evidently in women, highlighting the relevance of sex differences in the impact of cardiovascular risk. We summarize each major antihypertensive drug class's effects on cognitive impairment and AD pathology, revealing how carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, diuretics modulating cerebral blood flow, have recently gained preclinical evidence as promising treatment against AD. We also report novel vascular biomarkers for AD and dementia risk, highlighting those associated with hypertension and HHcy. Importantly, we propose that future studies should consider hypertension and HHcy as potential contributors to cognitive impairment, and that uncovering the underlying molecular mechanisms and biomarkers would aid in the identification of preventive strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据