4.7 Article

Synaptic resilience is associated with maintained cognition during ageing

期刊

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/alz.12894

关键词

ageing; Alzheimer's; cognition; synapse

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  2. Economic and Social Research Council [BB/W008793/1]
  3. Medical Research Council [MR/M01311/1]
  4. Wellcome Trust [628TRN R46470]
  5. Royal Society [221890/Z/20/Z]
  6. Economic and Social Research Council new investigator
  7. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme
  8. UK Dementia Research Institute
  9. [ES/S015604/1]
  10. [681181]
  11. [DRI-Edin005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the contribution of synaptic molecular changes to age-related cognitive decline and finds that synaptic pathology and gene expression related to synaptic signaling are associated with Alzheimer's disease.
IntroductionIt remains unclear why age increases risk of Alzheimer's disease and why some people experience age-related cognitive decline in the absence of dementia. Here we test the hypothesis that resilience to molecular changes in synapses contribute to healthy cognitive ageing. MethodsWe examined post-mortem brain tissue from people in mid-life (n = 15), healthy ageing with either maintained cognition (n = 9) or lifetime cognitive decline (n = 8), and Alzheimer's disease (n = 13). Synapses were examined with high resolution imaging, proteomics, and RNA sequencing. Stem cell-derived neurons were challenged with Alzheimer's brain homogenate. ResultsSynaptic pathology increased, and expression of genes involved in synaptic signaling decreased between mid-life, healthy ageing and Alzheimer's. In contrast, brain tissue and neurons from people with maintained cognition during ageing exhibited decreases in synaptic signaling genes compared to people with cognitive decline. DiscussionEfficient synaptic networks without pathological protein accumulation may contribute to maintained cognition during ageing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据