4.7 Article

Amyloid futures in the expanding pathology of brain aging and dementia

期刊

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/alz.12896

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; amyloid peptides; APP processing; A beta

资金

  1. NIH [T32-AG000037, P30AG066519, R01-AG051521, P50-AG05142, P01-AG055367, P50-AG005142, P30-AG066530, P30-AG066509, U01-AG006781]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PET imaging studies of AD patients show progressive increases of fibrillar A beta-amyloid. This study analyzed soluble A beta levels in AD and controls, and found that soluble A beta levels overlapped significantly between AD and controls, in contrast to the PET findings on fibrillar A beta. These findings highlight the importance of further postmortem analysis to understand the relationship between diverse forms of A beta and PET.
Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging studies of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients show progressive increases of fibrillar A beta-amyloid. Because current PET ligands underestimate nonfibrillar forms, we assayed soluble A beta in AD and controls. To identify the mechanisms responsible for soluble A beta in AD brains, we examined lipid rafts (LRs), where amyloid precursor protein (APP) is enzymatically processed. Frontal cortex was compared with cerebellum, which has minimal AD pathology. Compared with cognitively normal controls (CTL; Braak 0-1), elevations of soluble A beta 40 and A beta 42 were similar for intermediate- and later-stage AD (Braak 2-3 and 4-6). Clinical-grade AD showed a greater increase in soluble A beta 40 than A beta 42 relative to CTL. LR raft yield per gram AD frontal cortex was 20% below that of controls, whereas cerebellar LR did not differ by Braak score. The extensive overlap of soluble A beta levels in controls with AD contrasts with the PET findings on fibrillar A beta. These findings further support fibrillar A beta as a biomarker for AD treatments and show the need for more detailed postmortem analysis of diverse soluble and insoluble A beta aggregates in relation to PET.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据