4.5 Article

Hypersonic Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction over a Compression Ramp

期刊

AIAA JOURNAL
卷 61, 期 4, 页码 1579-1595

出版社

AMER INST AERONAUTICS ASTRONAUTICS
DOI: 10.2514/1.J062521

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study was conducted on ramp-induced planar shock-wave/turbulent-boundary-layer interactions at hypersonic conditions using numerical simulation. The aim was to investigate the effects of wall temperature and Reynolds number. The results showed that the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations could accurately predict the main features of the interactions. Various flow cases were computed to examine the scaling of heat transfer at different wall temperatures. It was found that the interaction zone decreased as the wall was cooled, and a power law originally introduced by Back and Cuffel successfully collapsed the data.
A parametric study of ramp-induced planar shock-wave/turbulent-boundary-layer interactions (SBLIs) is carried out at hypersonic conditions (Mach number 6.0) by means of numerical simulation of the Reynolds-averaged Navier- Stokes (RANS) equations, with the eventual goal of establishing wall temperature and Reynolds number effects. Comparison with available experimental data shows that RANS is capable of predicting the main features of hypersonic oblique SBLI, namely, typical size and distribution of the wall-surface pressure, and heat transfer. A large number of flow cases, at low (Re-delta 2 asymptotic to 1500) and high Reynolds number (Re-delta 2 asymptotic to 10;000), were computed to examine the scaling of the heat transfer over a wide range of wall temperatures. As expected, the interaction zone of hypersonic ramp-induced SBLI is reduced as the wall is cooled. A simple power law for heat transfer originally introduced by Back and Cuffel (AIAA Journal, Vol. 8, No. 10,1970, pp. 1871-1873) is here considered to account for hypersonic ramp-induced SBLI, which is found to successfully collapse the data to the distributions obtained for supersonic, cold/hot interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据