4.6 Article

Transition to legume-supported farming in Europe through redesigning cropping systems

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1007/s13593-022-00861-w

关键词

DEED; Environment; Economics; Multi-criteria assessment; Crop rotation; Participation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Legume-supported cropping systems have the potential to increase protein self-sufficiency and reduce environmental impacts in European agriculture. Using the DEED framework, we collaborated with scientists and advisors in 17 study areas to describe, explain, explore, and redesign cropping systems. The results showed that legume integration reduced N fertilizer use and nitrous oxide emissions, decreased nitrate leaching, and increased protein yield per hectare. However, energy yields were lower in legume-supported systems, and economic criteria were identified as important for feasibility and adaptation. Overall, the close stakeholder interactions and large-scale application of the DEED framework demonstrated the benefits of redesigning legume-supported cropping systems in Europe.
Legume-supported cropping systems affect environmental, production, and economic impacts. In Europe, legume production is still marginal with grain legumes covering less than 3% of arable land. A transition towards legume-supported systems could contribute to a higher level of protein self-sufficiency and lower environmental impacts of agriculture. Suitable approaches for designing legume-supported cropping systems are required that go beyond the production of prescriptive solutions. We applied the DEED framework with scientists and advisors in 17 study areas in nine European countries, enabling us to describe, explain, explore, and redesign cropping systems. The results of 31 rotation comparisons showed that legume integration decreased N fertilizer use and nitrous oxide emissions (N2O) in more than 90% of the comparisons with reductions ranging from 6 to 142 kg N ha(-1) and from 1 to 6 kg N2O ha(-1), respectively. In over 75% of the 24 arable cropping system comparisons, rotations with legumes had lower nitrate leaching and higher protein yield per hectare. The assessment of above-ground biodiversity showed no considerable difference between crop rotations with and without legumes in most comparisons. Energy yields were lower in legume-supported systems in more than 90% of all comparisons. Feasibility and adaptation needs of legume systems were discussed in joint workshops and economic criteria were highlighted as particularly important, reflecting findings from the rotation comparisons in which 63% of the arable systems with legumes had lower standard gross margins. The DEED framework enabled us to keep close contact with the engaged research-farmer networks. Here, we demonstrate that redesigning legume-supported cropping systems through a process of close stakeholder interactions provides benefits compared to traditional methods and that a large-scale application in diverse study areas is feasible and needed to support the transition to legume-supported farming in Europe.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据