4.7 Article

Aquaculture farm largely increase indirect nitrous oxide emission factors of lake

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2022.108212

关键词

Lake aquaculture; Nitrous oxide; Indirect emission; Emission factors; Temporal -spatial variability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Freshwater aquaculture is a major source of nitrous oxide emissions in agricultural industries. A study found that the indirect N2O emissions from lake aquaculture were over one order of magnitude higher than from open water. The ratio of carbon to nitrogen resulting from feed application was identified as an important factor contributing to the increased N2O production efficiency in aquaculture farms.
Freshwater aquaculture system is one of the main sources of nitrous oxide (N2O) and must be accounted for when reporting indirect N2O emissions from agricultural industries. The IPCC based approach recommend the indirect N2O emission factors (EF5) to estimate the emissions from freshwater. Unfortunately, the EF5 for lake aqua -culture, one of the most common freshwater aquacultures, has never been reported due to the scarcity of field data. To better understand the magnitude of EF5 at lake aquaculture and identify the control factors, the EF5 at aquaculture farm and open water (non-aquaculture region) of Lake Taihu were investigated based on long-term (2012-2017) in-situ field measurements. Our results showed the indirect N2O emission at the aquaculture farm (1.52 +/- 0.49 mu mol m-2 d-1) was over one order of magnitude higher than at the open water (0.12 +/- 0.49 mu mol m-2 d-1). Furthermore, we also found large variability in the EF5, which varied by one order of magnitude across time. The EF5 was predicted by nitrogen and the mass ratio of carbon to nitrogen. The significantly higher mass ratio of DOC to DIN resulting from feed application contributed to substantial increase in the N2O production efficiency and EF5 at the aquaculture farm. The average EF5 at the aquaculture farm and open water were 0.0021 +/- 0.0013 and 0.0013 +/- 0.0010, respectively. However, the measured EF5 was lower than that IPCC's default value of 0.0025, implying IPCC method yielded the overestimated indirect emission, and large bias will occur when only use constant value considering the dramatic variability of observed EF5.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据