4.7 Review

Comparison of international standards for irrigation with reclaimed water

期刊

AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT
卷 274, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107974

关键词

Reclaimed water; Agricultural irrigation; Green space irrigation; Water quality; International standards

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. [52079146]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water scarcity has become a significant issue due to global environmental and climate changes. Reclaimed water has been widely utilized to improve water utilization efficiency, but it also poses potential environmental health risks. Therefore, standards have been established to regulate the irrigation with reclaimed water and this paper compares these standards among different organizations and countries.
Water shortage problems have received wide attention since the past decades as the global environment and climate continue to change. To tackle with this escalating challenge, generations of study has been conducted in the research for water utilization efficiency. Reclaimed water has been widely used in many countries for in-dustry, agriculture and landscape. Despite the economic value and environmental benefits the reclaimed water brings,. contents such as heavy metal ions, organic pollutants and pathogenic microorganisms may enter the soil -plant-atmosphere system, thus posing potential environmental health risks. Therefore, many laws, guidelines and standards have been published to maintain the security of irrigation with reclaimed water. This paper compares the standards of irrigation with reclaimed water among different organizations and countries by analyzing the similarities and differences from different types of classification and water quality parameters requirements, in which their advantages and limitations are demonstrated. Finally, some suggestions are provided for future development and modification of the relevant standards in this field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据