4.7 Article

Sustainable cooling strategies to minimize water consumption in a greenhouse in a hot arid region

期刊

AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT
卷 274, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107960

关键词

Greenhouse cooling; Water saving; Water scarcity; Closed greenhouse; Evaporative cooling; EAHE

资金

  1. New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The closed greenhouse utilizes earth-air heat exchangers (EAHE) and fogging to control temperature and humidity efficiently. EAHE decreases water consumption by 50% and reduces maximum interior temperature to 35 degrees Celsius. Compared to a fan-pad system, the closed greenhouse has lower water and energy usage, as well as more stable relative humidity.
Evaporative cooling systems are the currently used technology for providing cooling to greenhouses in arid regions where typically the greenhouse is ventilated. However, they consume a large quantity of water to cool the air. A closed greenhouse is proposed that uses earth-air heat exchangers (EAHE) and fogging to control the interior temperature and relative humidity in a water-efficient manner. A numerical model has been developed for the greenhouse and EAHE, and have been validated against experimental data collected from literature. Simulations are performed to compare the proposed closed greenhouse performance against the fan-pad system in a ventilated greenhouse in maintaining a suitable temperature and humidity, and to estimate the water usages. The EAHE reduced the water consumed by the fogging system by 50 % and the maximum interior temperature from 50 degrees C to 35 degrees C. The temperature reduction was found comparable to a fan-pad system with a ventilation rate of 20 air changes per hour, however, with a more stable relative humidity at approximately 75 %. Furthermore, water used for cooling was lower by one tenth of that of the fan-pad system, reducing it from 53 litre/day to 5 litre/day.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据