4.8 Article

A Template Editing Strategy to Create Interlayer-Confined Active Species for Efficient and Durable Oxygen Evolution Reaction

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202203420

关键词

interlayer-confined active species; Ni hydroxides; oxygen evolution reaction; template editing strategy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a template editing strategy to address the issue of overpotentials and unstable active sites in oxygen evolution reaction (OER) electrocatalysts. By grafting highly active catalytic species onto highly conductive rigid frameworks, the strategy achieves efficient and durable OER activity. The results demonstrate the possibility of stable homogeneous-like catalysis in heterogeneous catalysis.
Substantial overpotentials and insufficient and unstable active sites of oxygen evolution reaction (OER) electrocatalysts limit their efficiency and stability in OER-related energy conversion and storage technologies. Here, a template editing strategy is proposed to graft highly active catalytic species onto highly conductive rigid frameworks to tackle this challenge. As a successful attempt, two types of NiO6 units of layered Ni BDC (BDC stands for 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid) metal organic frameworks are selectively edited by chemical etching-assisted electroxidation to create layered gamma-NiOOH with intercalated Ni-O species. In such an interlayer-confined intercalated architecture, the large interlayer space with high ion permeability offers an ideal reaction region to sufficiently expose the OER active sites comprising high-density intercalated Ni-O species, which also suppresses the undesirable gamma to beta phase transformation, thus exhibiting efficient and durable OER activity. As a result, water oxidation can occur at an extremely low overpotential of 130 mV and affords 1000 h stability at 100 mA cm(-2). The strategy conceptually shows the possibility of achieving stable homogeneous-like catalysis in heterogeneous catalysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据