4.8 Article

Unlocking the Full Potential of Electron-Acceptor Molecules for Efficient and Stable Hole Injection

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 35, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202210413

关键词

acceptor molecules; electron affinity; hole injection; organic electronics; organic light-emitting diodes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding and improving hole-injection mechanism is crucial for the development of organic optoelectronic devices. By controlling the charged state of an electron-acceptor molecule, efficient and stable hole injection can be achieved, enabling the realization of a pure blue organic light-emitting diode with low turn-on voltage, high power efficiency, and high quantum efficiency.
Understanding the hole-injection mechanism and improving the hole-injection property are of pivotal importance in the future development of organic optoelectronic devices. Electron-acceptor molecules with high electron affinity (EA) are widely used in electronic applications, such as hole injection and p-doping. Although p-doping has generally been studied in terms of matching the ionization energy (IE) of organic semiconductors with the EA of acceptor molecules, little is known about the effect of the EA of acceptor molecules on the hole-injection property. In this work, the hole-injection mechanism in devices is completely clarified, and a strategy to optimize the hole-injection property of the acceptor molecule is developed. Efficient and stable hole injection is found to be possible even into materials with IEs as high as 5.8 eV by controlling the charged state of an acceptor molecule with an EA of about 5.0 eV. This excellent hole-injection property enables direct hole injection into an emitting layer, realizing a pure blue organic light-emitting diode with an extraordinarily low turn-on voltage of 2.67 V, a power efficiency of 29 lm W-1, an external quantum efficiency of 28% and a Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage y coordinate of less than 0.10.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据