4.8 Article

Enhanced Selectivity in the Electroproduction of H2O2 via F/S Dual-Doping in Metal-Free Nanofibers

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 35, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202208533

关键词

heteroatom doping; hydrogen peroxide; metal-free electrocatalysts; selectivity; synergistic effect

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers have developed a large-scale H2O2 electrocatalyst based on metal-free carbon fibers doped with fluorine and sulfur. This catalyst exhibits excellent performance, including high onset potential and almost ideal 2e(-) pathway selectivity, surpassing most carbon-based or metal-based electrocatalysts reported so far. The enhanced performance is attributed to intermolecular charge transfer and electron spin redistribution facilitated by fluorine and sulfur dual-doping.
Electrocatalytic two-electron oxygen reduction (2e(-) ORR) to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is attracting broad interest in diversified areas including paper manufacturing, wastewater treatment, production of liquid fuels, and public sanitation. Current efforts focus on researching low-cost, large-scale, and sustainable electrocatalysts with high activity and selectivity. Here a large-scale H2O2 electrocatalysts based on metal-free carbon fibers with a fluorine and sulfur dual-doping strategy is engineered. Optimized samples yield with a high onset potential of 0.814 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE), an almost ideal 2e(-) pathway selectivity of 99.1%, outperforming most of the recently reported carbon-based or metal-based electrocatalysts. First principle theoretical computations and experiments demonstrate that the intermolecular charge transfer coupled with electron spin redistribution from fluorine and sulfur dual-doping is the crucial factor contributing to the enhanced performances in 2e(-) ORR. This work opens the door to the design and implementation of scalable, earth-abundant, highly selective electrocatalysts for H2O2 production and other catalytic fields of industrial interest.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据