4.8 Article

A Dual-Functional Cationic Covalent Organic Frameworks Modified Separator for High Energy Lithium Metal Batteries

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 33, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202212466

关键词

cationic covalent organic frameworks; separator modification; solvation structures; solid electrolyte interphase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through material modification, the commercial polypropylene separator is successfully modified with a cationic covalent organic framework (COF-F@PP), which has abundant nanopores to homogenize the lithium ions flux and can interact with electrolyte solvent molecules to form a desolvation structure of Li+. The F- within the nanopores helps to build a robust LiF-riched solid electrolyte interphase to avoid side reactions between the lithium anode and electrolyte. Therefore, COF-F@PP exhibits excellent cycling stability, high Coulombic efficiency, and superior rate capability in Li//LFP coin cell at 5 C, low N/P ratio (2.19) full cell, and pouch cell at 1 C.
Separator modification is an efficient strategy to handle with the challenges of lithium metal batteries but its success is primarily subject to the modification of the materials. Herein, a cationic covalent organic framework (COF) composed of positively charged organic units and weakly bonded fluoride ions (F-) is introduced to modify the commercial polypropylene separator (COF-F@PP). It is found that the organic unit has abundant nanopores to homogenize the lithium ions (Li+) flux and can interact with electrolyte solvent molecules to form a desolvation structure of Li+. Meanwhile, the F- within the nanopores is proved to assist in building a robust LiF-riched solid electrolyte interphase to avoid the side reactions between lithium anode and electrolyte. Hence, the COF-F@PP delivers feasible practicality for the outstanding cycling stability, high Coulombic efficiency, and superior rate capability of Li//LFP coin cell at 5 C, low N/P ratio (2.19) full cell, and pouch cell at 1 C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据