4.8 Article

Lithium Difluorophosphate as a Widely Applicable Additive to Boost Lithium-Ion Batteries: a Perspective

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 33, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202211958

关键词

additives; cathode electrolyte interphases; lithium difluorophosphate; lithium-ion batteries; solid electrolyte interphases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium difluorophosphate (LiDFP) is widely used as an additive to improve the performance of high-voltage cathodes and Li metal anodes. This article reviews its applications and proposes a universal working mechanism based on the current understanding. Future directions for further comprehension and effective application strategies are discussed. This study provides new knowledge and inspires more effective additive applications.
Lithium difluorophosphate (LiDFP) is among the most widely applicable additives used to construct a robust solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on electrode, which can improve the cycling performance and rate performance of high-voltage cathodes and Li metal anodes at extreme temperatures. Regarding the working mechanism of LiDFP, reasonable but divided understandings have been proposed based on specific battery chemistry. Herein, the broad applications of LiDFP in various electrochemical systems are reviewed and a universal working mechanism based on the state-of-the-art understanding of LiDFP is offered. Then, future directions of the missing part in mechanism comprehension are highlighted. Furthermore, the approaches to effectively apply LiDFP and other similar additives according to their limits are summarized. Finally, questions regarding the missing part of the mechanism are discussed by which LiDFP forms a robust SEI and how these lead to opportunities for future understanding and promotion of interfacial passivation. This study not only provides new knowledge on the mechanism of LiDFP and other existing additives but also helps inspire more effective additive applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据