4.8 Article

Pre-Deoxidation of Layered Ni-Rich Cathodes to Construct a Stable Interface with Electrolyte for Long Cycling Life

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 33, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202211171

关键词

Ni-rich cathodes; oxygen escape; structural stability; surface modifications

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To address the capacity decay and structural instability of Ni-rich layered oxides in lithium-ion batteries, a pre-deoxidation method was used to improve the surface structure and defect chemistry of the materials, resulting in enhanced stability and cycling performance.
Ni-rich layered oxides as the cathode materials of high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) suffer from capacity decay and structural instability owing to oxygen loss during cycling. It is a huge challenge to prevent the oxygen loss of Ni-rich cathode materials during long cycling. Here, a pre-deoxidation of LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 (NCM811) single crystal materials is achieved by heat treatment at elevated temperatures in argon condition to form a stable surface with rock salt structure. The stable surface structure with oxygen vacancy defects successfully suppresses the harmful phase transitions of NCM811 and effectively improves the stability of the NCM811/electrolyte interface during cycling at a high cut-off voltage. In addition, the intragranular structural evolution and cation mixing degree is inhibited to effectively suppress the intergranular cracking and particle pulverization of cathode during long cycling. The pre-deoxidation of NCM811 exhibits 70.6% capacity retention after 1000 cycles at the current density of 0.5 C between 2.8 and 4.3 V, which is much larger than that of pristine NCM811 capacity retention of 27.3%. The strategy of pre-deoxidation of Ni-rich layered structure cathode to regulate the defect chemistry and surface structure provides a facile and effective way to achieve long cycling life high-energy density LIBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据