4.8 Article

Ligand Coupling and Decoupling Modulates Stem Cell Fate

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 33, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202206673

关键词

ligand coupling; dynamic nanorods; integrin binding; stem cell adhesions; stem cell fate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Materials with movably couplable ligands are developed by grafting liganded gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) to a substrate and flexibly grafting liganded movable linear nanomaterials (MLNs) to the substrate via a bendable linker, creating a decoupled state. Magnetic control of the MLNs decreases the space between MLNs and AuNPs, coupling them together. Remote control of ligand coupling stimulates integrin recruitment, facilitating stem cell focal adhesion, mechanosensing, and potential differentiation, while ligand decoupling suppresses these processes. Versatile tuning of MLNs can help advance regenerative therapies by studying ligand-coupling-dependent stem cell fate.
In natural microenvironment, various proteins containing adhesive ligands in fibrous and non-fibrous structures dynamically couple and decouple to regulate stem cell fate. Herein, materials presenting movably couplable ligands are developed by grafting liganded gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) to a substrate followed by flexibly grafting liganded movable linear nanomaterials (MLNs) to the substrate via a long bendable linker, thereby creating a space between the MLNs and the AuNPs in the decoupled state. Magnetic control of the MLNs decreases this space via the bending of the linker to couple the MLNs to the AuNPs. Remote control of ligand coupling stimulates integrin recruitment to the coupled ligands, thereby non-toxically facilitating the focal adhesion, mechanosensing, and potential differentiation of stem cells, which is suppressed by ligand decoupling. Versatile tuning of size, aspect ratio, distributions, and ligands of the MLNs can help to decipher dynamic ligand-coupling-dependent stem cell fate to advance regenerative therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据