4.8 Article

A Machine Learning-Assisted Approach to a Rapid and Reliable Screening for Mechanically Stable Perovskite-Based Materials

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202210374

关键词

AdaBoost; feature engineering; formability; hull energy; machine learning; mechanical stability; perovskites

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilizes machine learning techniques to discover new perovskite-based materials with high mechanical stability. Machine learning models are built to predict the moduli of materials based on their crystal structure and composition information. The models show reliable performance and have been successfully applied in a screening process.
The present work is designed to discover new perovskite-based materials, which are expected to show high mechanical stability during their applications, using machine learning (ML) techniques, and based on the Pugh's criterion for distinguishing brittle and ductile behaviors. For this purpose, ML models to predict the moduli of materials, bulk (B) and shear (G), are built using their crystal structure and composition information. The ML process is initiated with the information of 5663 compounds, including composition, crystal structure and moduli, as listed in AFLOW database. Following a procedure of data characteristics, feature generation, feature processing, training, and testing, the ML models are constructed with acceptable accuracy (tenfold cross-validation R-2 score of 0.90 and 0.89 for B and G, respectively). The validation process of the models, which is conducted using the corresponding density functional theory calculations, reveals that these models are reliable to be employed in a large-scale screening process. Indeed, the B- and G-based ML models are incorporated in a screening process, and this is also conjugated with other screening criterions, to find out thermodynamically stable and formable perovskite-based materials with improved mechanical performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据