4.5 Article

Regional Swedish study found that one in seven coeliac patients experienced loss of follow up during childhood

期刊

ACTA PAEDIATRICA
卷 112, 期 3, 页码 510-521

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apa.16633

关键词

celiac disease; coeliac disease; loss of follow up; tissue transglutaminase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to examine the clinical follow up of paediatric coeliac disease and the rate of loss of follow up during childhood. The results showed that 14% of the coeliac patients were lost to follow up after an average of 5.3 years since diagnosis. The patients who were lost to follow up were more often boys and had a slightly longer average disease duration.
AimTo examine the clinical follow up of paediatric coeliac disease and the rate of loss of follow up during childhood, for which data are scarce. MethodsIn a cohort of coeliac children diagnosed in 2013-2018 in Gothenburg, Sweden, we retrospectively explored the follow-up practice of paediatric coeliac disease until June 2021. We used medical records from hospital-based paediatric gastroenterology and general paediatric outpatient clinics, laboratory records, and questionnaires. Loss of follow up was defined no coeliac disease-related follow up or tissue transglutaminase test over the past 2years of study enrolment. ResultsWe included 162 children (58% girls) aged 7.8-18.2years (average 12.7). Most participants (76%) were followed at general paediatric outpatient clinics rather than hospital-based clinics. After 2.3-8.8 (average 5.3) years since diagnosis, 23 patients (14%; 95% confidence interval, 9%-21%) had been lost to follow up. Patients with loss of follow up were more often boys (61% versus 39%, p = 0.08), with a somewhat longer average disease duration of 5.8 versus 5.2years (p = 0.11). There were no between-group differences in socio-economic characteristics and patient-reported experience measures of coeliac disease care. ConclusionOne in seven coeliac patients may experience loss of follow up during childhood.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据