4.5 Review

Cooling strategies during neonatal transport for hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy

期刊

ACTA PAEDIATRICA
卷 112, 期 4, 页码 587-602

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apa.16632

关键词

hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy; neonatal transport; systematic review; therapeutic hypothermia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review examined cooling methods during transport of newborn infants with HIE and found that servo-controlled active cooling was more effective in maintaining body temperature within the target range during transfer to a neonatal intensive care unit.
AimWe reviewed the literature on cooling methods during transport of newborn infants with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) born in a non-tertiary centre and transferred to a neonatal intensive care unit for therapeutic hypothermia. MethodsThe electronic databases CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched from inception up to 8 March 2022 for studies comparing cooling versus no cooling, active versus passive cooling, and servo-controlled versus non-servo-controlled cooling. Odds ratio and confidence of interval were calculated for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference and confidence interval for continuous outcomes. ResultsThe final analysis included 14 studies, 1 randomised and 13 non-randomised, involving 1098 newborn infants. Compared with the other cooling methods, servo-controlled active cooling was more likely to maintain body temperature within the target range of 33 degrees C-34 degrees C on arrival at a neonatal intensive care unit: odds ratio 13.58, 95% confidence interval 4.32-42.66, risk difference 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.19-0.46; 224 participants; three studies; I-2 0%. The certainty of evidence was low. Only five studies reported mortality rates. ConclusionServo-controlled active cooling may be the preferred method during transport of newborn infants with HIE. A future area of focus should be long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes after servo-controlled active cooling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据