4.5 Review

The clinical spectrum of sporadic and familial forms of frontotemporal dementia

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 138, 期 -, 页码 6-31

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jnc.13654

关键词

amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; C9ORF72; frontotemporal dementia; progranulin; tau

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MR/M018288/1, MR/M008525/1, MR/J009482/1, MR/M501724/1, MR/M023664/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2012-18-010] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [MR/M501724/1, MR/M018288/1, MR/M023664/1, MR/J009482/1, MR/M008525/1] Funding Source: Medline
  4. MRC [MR/M023664/1, MR/M018288/1, MR/M008525/1, MR/J009482/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The term frontotemporal dementia (FTD) describes a clinically, genetically and pathologically diverse group of neurodegenerative disorders. Symptoms of FTD can present in individuals in their 20s through to their 90s, but the mean age at onset is in the sixth decade. The most common presentation is with a change in personality and impaired social conduct (behavioural variant FTD). Less frequently patients present with language problems (primary progressive aphasia). Both of these groups of patients can develop motor features consistent with either motor neuron disease (usually the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis variant) or parkinsonism (most commonly a progressive supranuclear palsy or corticobasal syndrome). In about a third of cases FTD is familial, with mutations in the progranulin, microtubule-associated protein tau and chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 genes being the major causes. Mutations in a number of other genes including TANK-binding kinase 1 are rare causes of familial FTD. This review aims to clarify the often confusing terminology of FTD, and outline the various clinical features and diagnostic criteria of sporadic and familial FTD syndromes. It will also discuss the current major challenges in FTD research and clinical practice, and potential areas for future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据