4.5 Article

Atf6α deficiency suppresses microglial activation and ameliorates pathology of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 139, 期 6, 页码 1124-1137

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jnc.13714

关键词

inflammation; microglia; multiple sclerosis; UPR

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Technology, Sports and Culture of Japan [24500419, 26430069, 15H01374]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H01374, 24500419, 26430069] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accumulating evidence suggests a critical role for the unfolded protein response in multiple sclerosis (MS) and in its animal model, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). In this study, we investigated the relevance of activating transcription factor 6 alpha (ATF6 alpha), an upstream regulator of part of the unfolded protein response, in EAE. The expressions of ATF6 alpha-target molecular chaperones such as glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) and glucose-regulated protein 94 (GRP94) were enhanced in the acute inflammatory phase after induction of EAE. Deletion of Atf6 alpha suppressed the accumulation of T cells and microglia/macrophages in the spinal cord, and ameliorated the clinical course and demyelination after EAE induction. In contrast to the phenotypes in the spinal cord, activation status of T cells in the peripheral tissues or in the culture system was not different between two genotypes. Bone marrow transfer experiments and adoptive transfer of autoimmune CD4(+) T cells to recipient mice (passive EAE) also revealed that CNS-resident cells are responsible for the phenotypes observed in Atf6 alpha(-/-) mice. Further experiments with cultured cells indicated that inflammatory response was reduced in Atf6 alpha(-/-) microglia, but not in Atf6 alpha(-/-) astrocytes, and was associated with proteasome-dependent degradation of NF-kappa B p65. Thus, our results demonstrate a novel role for ATF6 alpha in microglia-mediated CNS inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据