4.5 Article

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) prevents corticosterone-induced changes in astrocyte morphology and function

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 136, 期 6, 页码 1155-1167

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jnc.13510

关键词

astrocytes; docosahexaenoic acid; glucocorticoids; omega-3; polyunsaturated fatty acids; stress

资金

  1. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), France
  2. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR), France [ANR-09-ALIA-006-01]
  3. Unilever, Netherlands (Marie Hennebelle PhD fellowship)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The many functions of astrocytes, such as glutamate recycling and morphological plasticity, enable them to stabilize synapses environment and protect neurons. Little is known about how they adapt to glucocorticoid-induced stress, and even less about the influence of dietary factors. We previously showed that omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (3PUFA), dietary fats which alleviate stress responses, influence the way astroglia regulate glutamatergic synapses. We have explored the role of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), the main 3PUFA, in the astroglial responses to corticosterone, the main stress hormone in rodents to determine whether 3PUFA help astrocytes resist stress. Cultured rat astrocytes were enriched in DHA or arachidonic acid (AA, the main 6PUFA) and given 100nM corticosterone for several days. Corticosterone stimulated astrocyte glutamate recycling by increasing glutamate uptake and glutamine synthetase (GS), and altered the astrocyte cytoskeleton. DHA-enriched astrocytes no longer responded to the action of corticosterone on glutamate uptake, had decreased GS, and the cytoskeletal effect of corticosterone was delayed, while AA-enriched cells were unaffected. The DHA-dependent anti-corticosterone effect was related to fewer glucocorticoid receptors, while corticosterone increased DHA incorporation into astrocyte membranes. Thus, DHA helps astrocytes resist the influence of corticosterone, so perhaps promoting a sustainable response by the stressed brain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据