4.6 Article

A Novel Stereospecific Bioluminescent Assay for Detection of Endogenous D-Cysteine

期刊

ACS CHEMICAL NEUROSCIENCE
卷 13, 期 23, 页码 3257-3262

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00528

关键词

D-cysteine; luciferase; D-amino acids; stereospecific; bioluminescent; endogenous; mammals; serine racemase; racemization; neurotransmitter

资金

  1. [P50 DA044123]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals the presence of endogenous D-cysteine in mammals and introduces a novel bioluminescent assay for its quantitative estimation in tissues. The findings highlight the enrichment of D-cysteine in embryonic brains and its higher levels in human brain white matter compared to gray matter.
The presence of endogenous D-stereoisomers of amino acids in mammals dispels a long-standing dogma about their existence. D-Serine and D-aspartate function as novel neurotransmitters in mammals. However, the stereoisomer with the fastest, spontaneous in vitro racemization rate, D-cysteine, has not been reported. We utilized a novel, stereospecific, bioluminescent assay to identify endogenous D-cysteine in substantial amounts in the eye, brain, and pancreas of mice. D-Cysteine is enriched in mice embryonic brains at day E9.5 (4.5 mM) and decreases progressively with development (mu M levels). D-Cysteine is also present in significantly higher amounts in the human brain white matter compared with gray matter. In the luciferase assay, D-cysteine conjugates with cyano hydroxy benzothiazole in the presence of a base and reducing agent to form D-luciferin. D-Luciferin, subsequently, in the presence of firefly luciferase and ATP, emits bioluminescence proportional to the concentration of D-cysteine. The assay is stereospecific and allows the quantitative estimation of endogenous D-cysteine in tissues in addition to its specificity for D-cysteine. Future efforts aimed at bioluminescent in vivo imaging of D-cysteine may allow a more noninvasive means of its detection, thereby elucidating its function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据