4.8 Article

Sulfonium-Functionalized Polystyrene-Based Nonchemically Amplified Resists Enabling Sub-13 nm Nanolithography

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 2289-2300

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c19940

关键词

nonchemically amplified resists; sulfonium-functionalized polystyrene; electron beam lithography; extreme ultraviolet lithography; mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nonchemically amplified resists based on polystyrene modified with triphenyl sulfonium triflate groups were prepared. The level of sulfonium groups could be controlled by changing the feed ratio of raw materials, resulting in two different resists with sulfonium ratios of 50% and 70%. The PSTS0.7 resist exhibited a better resolution (18 nm half-pitch) compared to the PSTS0.5 resist (20 nm half-pitch) under the same developing conditions for electron beam lithography.
Nonchemically amplified resists based on triphenyl sulfonium triflate-modified polystyrene (PSTS) were prepared by a facile method of modification of polystyrene with sulfonium groups. The uploading of the sulfonium group can be well controlled by changing the feed ratio of raw materials, resulting in PSTS0.5 and PSTS0.7 resists with sulfonium ratios of 50 and 70%, respectively. The optimum developer (methyl isobutyl ketone/ ethanol = 1:7) is obtained by analyzing contrast curves of electron beam lithography (EBL). PSTS0.7 exhibits a better resolution (18 nm half-pitch (HP)) than the PSTS0.5 resist (20 nm HP) at the same developing conditions for EBL. This novel resist platform was further evaluated by extreme ultraviolet lithography, and patterning performance down to 13 nm HP at a dose of 186 mJ cm-2 with a line edge roughness of 2.8 nm was achieved. Our detailed study of the reaction and patterning mechanism suggests that the decomposition of the polar triflate and triphenyl sulfonium groups into nonpolar sulfide or polystyrene plays an important role in the solubility switch.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据