4.8 Article

Metal-Organic Framework Optical Thermometer Based on Cr3+ Ion Luminescence

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 15, 期 5, 页码 7074-7082

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c19957

关键词

hybrid perovskite; luminescence; thermometry; chromium(III) ions; temperature sensing; noncontact optical thermometer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports the structural and luminescence studies of a series of six heterometallic perovskite-type metal-organic frameworks. The results show that these materials have tunable structural and luminescence properties, which can be used to design a temperature sensing model and make them promising candidates for noncontact thermometers.
Metal-organic frameworks with perovskite structures have recently attracted increasing attention due to their structural, optical, and phonon properties. Herein, we report the structural and luminescence studies of a series of six heterometallic perovskite-type metal-organic frameworks with the general formula [EA](2)NaCrxAl1-x(HCOO)(6), where x = 1, 0.78, 0.57, 0.30, 0.21, and 0. The diffuse reflectance spectral analysis provided valuable information, particularly on crystal field strength (Dq/B) and energy band gap (E-g). We showed that the Dq/B varies in the 2.33-2.76 range depending on the composition of the sample. Performed Raman, XRD, and lifetime decay analyses provided information on the relationship between those parameters and the chemical composition. We also performed the temperature-dependent luminescence studies within the 80-400 K range, which was the first attempt to use an organic-inorganic framework luminescence thermometer based solely on the luminescence of Cr3+ ions. The results showed a strong correlation between the surrounding temperature, composition, and spectroscopic properties, allowing one to design a temperature sensing model. The temperature-dependent luminescence of the Cr3+ ions makes the investigated materials promising candidates for noncontact thermometers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据