4.8 Article

Guanidine-Based Covalent Organic Frameworks: Cooperation between Cores and Linkers for Chromic Sensing and Efficient CO2 Conversion

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 15, 期 5, 页码 6902-6911

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c20510

关键词

COFs; organocatalysis; heterogeneous catalysis; CO2 utilization; C-H carboxylation; chromism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, triaminoguanidine-derived covalent organic frameworks (COFs) were used as platforms to develop heterogeneous organocatalysts for C(sp)-H carboxylation. The COFs with guanidine cores and pyrazine linkers showed high catalytic performance due to the cooperation between cores and linkers. The core, deprotonated to the guanidinato group, binds and activates CO2, while the pyrazine linker activates the C(sp)-H bond through hydrogen bonding. The COFs also exhibited acid- and base-responsive chromic behaviors, making them potential materials for sensing and switching applications.
C(sp)-H carboxylation with CO2 is an attractive route of CO2 utilization and is traditionally promoted by transition metal catalysts, and organocatalysis for the conversion remains rarely explored and challenging. In this article, triaminoguanidine-derived covalent organic frameworks (COFs) were used as platforms to develop heterogeneous organocatalysts for the reaction. We demonstrated that the COFs with guanidine cores and pyrazine linkers show high catalytic performance as a result of the cooperation between cores and linkers. The core is vitally important, which is deprotonated to the guanidinato group that binds and activates CO2. The pyrazine linker collaborates with the core to activate the C(sp)-H bond through hydrogen bonding. In addition, the COFs show acid-and base-responsive chromic behaviors thanks to the amphoteric nature of the core and the auxochromic effect of the pyrazine linker. The work opens up new avenues to organocatalysts for C-H carboxylation and chromic materials for sensing and switching applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据