4.7 Article

Cost Optimization for Cloud Storage from User Perspectives: Recent Advances, Taxonomy, and Survey

期刊

ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS
卷 55, 期 13S, 页码 -

出版社

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3582883

关键词

Storage-as-a-Service (STaaS); cloud storage; cost optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article comprehensively analyzes the opportunities, motivations, and challenges of cost optimization in cloud storage from user perspectives, and provides a summary of recent advances in storage efficiency, cloud storage services, and emerging storage paradigms. It offers a thorough survey focusing on how to optimize the cost of using cloud storage for cloud users.
With the development and maturity of cloud storage, it has attracted a large number of users. Although cloud users do not need to concern themselves with the infrastructure used for storage, thus saving on equipment and maintenance costs, the sheer volume of data still generates significant cloud storage usage costs, which motivates cloud storage users to look for ways to further save costs. In this article, we analyze the whole process of using cloud storage to exhaustively explore opportunities, motivations, and challenges of cost optimization from user perspectives. Then we provide a comprehensive taxonomy and summary of recent advances in terms of storage efficiency (i.e., cost optimization by improving storage efficiency), cloud storage services (i.e., cost optimization by leveraging the features of cloud storage services), and emerging storage paradigms (i.e., cost optimization by leveraging emerging storage paradigms like edge storage). Finally, we present future directions for cost optimization from user perspectives and present our conclusion. This article offers a thorough survey of recent advances focusing on how to optimize the cost of using cloud storage for cloud users, and it has an opportunity to attract a broad audience in the cost-effective cloud storage market.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据