4.6 Article

SiC protective coating for photovoltaic retinal prosthesis

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/4/046016

关键词

SiC; silicon carbide; retinal prostheses; protective coating; neural stimulation; chronic implant

资金

  1. US National Institutes of Health [R01-EY-018608]
  2. Department of Defense [W81XWH-15-1-0009]
  3. Stanford Spectrum fund
  4. Foundation Voir et Entendre (Paris)
  5. Pixium Vision
  6. National Science Foundation through the NNIN [ECS-9731293]
  7. SU2P fellowship, RCUK Science Bridges award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To evaluate plasma-enhanced, chemically vapor deposited (PECVD) amorphous silicon carbide (alpha-SiC:H) as a protective coating for retinal prostheses and other implantable devices, and to study their failure mechanisms in vivo. Approach. Retinal prostheses were implanted in rats sub-retinally for up to 1 year. Degradation of implants was characterized by optical and scanning electron microscopy. Dissolution rates of SiC, SiNx and thermal SiO2 were measured in accelerated soaking tests in saline at 87 degrees C. Defects in SiC films were revealed and analyzed by selectively removing the materials underneath those defects. Main results. At 87 degrees C SiNx dissolved at 18.3 +/- 0.3 nm d(-1), while SiO2 grown at high temperature (1000 degrees C) dissolved at 0.104 +/- 0.008 nm d(-1). SiC films demonstrated the best stability, with no quantifiable change after 112 d. Defects in thin SiC films appeared primarily over complicated topography and rough surfaces. Significance. SiC coatings demonstrating no erosion in accelerated aging test for 112 d at 87 degrees C, equivalent to about 10 years in vivo, can offer effective protection of the implants. Photovoltaic retinal prostheses with PECVD SiC coatings exhibited effective protection from erosion during the 4 month follow-up in vivo. The optimal thickness of SiC layers is about 560 nm, as defined by anti-reflective properties and by sufficient coverage to eliminate defects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据