4.7 Article

Traffic matrix prediction and estimation based on deep learning in large-scale IP backbone networks

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2016.10.006

关键词

Network traffic prediction; Network traffic estimation; Traffic matrix; Deep learning; Deep belief network

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61571104, 61071124]
  2. General Project of Scientific Research of the Education Department of Liaoning Province [L20150174]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-11-0075]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N150402003, N120804004, N130504003]
  5. State Scholarship Fund [201208210013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Network traffic analysis has been one of the most crucial techniques for preserving a large-scale IP backbone network. Despite its importance, large-scale network traffic monitoring techniques suffer from some technical and mercantile issues to obtain precise network traffic data. Though the network traffic estimation method has been the most prevalent technique for acquiring network traffic, it still has a great number of problems that need solving. With the development of the scale of our networks, the level of the ill-posed property of the network traffic estimation problem is more deteriorated. Besides, the statistical features of network traffic have changed greatly in terms of current network architectures and applications. Motivated by that, in this paper, we propose a network traffic prediction and estimation method respectively. We first use a deep learning architecture to explore the dynamic properties of network traffic, and then propose a novel network traffic prediction approach based on a deep belief network. We further propose a network traffic estimation method utilizing the deep belief network via link counts and routing information. We validate the effectiveness of our methodologies by real data sets from the Abilene and GEANT backbone networks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据