4.2 Article

In Vitro Evaluation of Carbon Nanotube-Based Scaffolds for Cartilage Tissue Engineering

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 16, 期 9, 页码 9022-9025

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2016.12733

关键词

Multi Walled Carbon Nanotubes; Scaffold; Cartilage Tissue Engineering; Chondrocyte

资金

  1. National Science Centre (Poland) [UMO-2012/06/A/ST4/00373]
  2. Institute of Nano-architectures for Energy Conversion at Helmholtz Zentrum Berlin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cartilage injuries are one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders. Although a number of techniques have been designed to treat cartilage lesions, current research is focused on tissue engineering methods. Recent advances in molecular biology, biotechnology, and polymer science have led to both the experimental and clinical application of various cell types and biomaterials in the treatment of cartilage injuries. This study reports an exceptionally good growth of chondrocytes on a 3D scaffold, based on multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). The MWCNT-based nanostructural scaffold was fabricated employing a plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition technique. Articular cartilage specimens were taken from the distal femur of adolescent New Zealand White rabbits and chondrocytes were obtained by collagenase digestion. The scaffolds were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Cell-seeded constructs were visualized with SEM. Chondrocytes adhered to the MWCNT surfaces and were evenly distributed. After one week of culturing, the number of cells was tripled on the MWCNT scaffolds in respect to the culturing in a plastic flask. These cells displayed multiple cytoplasmic extensions that interact with the MWCNTs. The nanotubes were bent by the cells and the cell morphology was altered through the nanostructured surface. Our study confirms that MWCNT-based surfaces provide a very good scaffold that can be used to stimulate the formation of cartilage tissue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据