4.1 Article

Differential activity of glucan phosphatase starch EXcess4 orthologs from agronomic crops

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcab.2022.102479

关键词

Glucan phosphatase; Starch degradation; Starch phosphorylation; Starch Excess4; Reversible starch phosphorylation

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [MCB-2012074, CHE-1808304, MCB-1817417]
  2. Schupf Scholar Program
  3. Skidmore College start-up funds
  4. Skidmore Summer Collaborative Research Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that different organisms have different glucan phosphatase activity, and the activity is directly correlated with glucan substrate binding and the ability to enhance in vitro starch degradation by beta-amylase BAM3.
The glucan phosphatase Starch EXcess4 (SEX4) plays an essential role in regulating starch degra-dation through reversible phosphorylation. However, starch granule properties and phosphoryla-tion levels vary widely between different organisms. We biochemically characterized SEX4 from agronomically relevant plants and found that SEX4 orthologs display differential glucan phos-phatase activity. SEX4 from cereal crops displayed higher dephosphorylation rates than SEX4 from storage tubers. Intriguingly, these rates were found to be inversely related to glucan sub-strate binding. To determine the effects of this difference, the ability of SEX4 orthologs to en-hance in vitro starch degradation by the beta-amylase BAM3 was measured. An inverse relationship was observed between SEX4 ortholog starch binding affinity and its ability to enhance BAM3-mediated glucan degradation. Collectively, our findings reveal a direct correlation between the dephosphorylation rates of SEX4 orthologs and their ability to enhance in vitro starch degrada-tion. These data provide significant insights into the differential activity of SEX4 from different organisms, corresponding to their distinct biological roles and providing the basis for utilizing their specific properties for industrial and biotechnological applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据