4.4 Article

Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Score is an Independent Predictor of Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

期刊

CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPEUTICS
卷 33, 期 5, 页码 294-299

出版社

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1111/1755-5922.12145

关键词

nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; Right ventricular function; speckle-tracking echocardiography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveNonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease and impaired left ventricular (LV) function, yet the impact of NAFLD on right ventricular (RV) function remains unclear. We investigate the RV functional properties in patients with NAFLD. MethodsNinety consecutive patients with the diagnosis of biopsy-proven NAFLD and 45 age- and sex-matched controls were included. All patients underwent an echocardiographic examination. RV function was evaluated by two-dimensional (2D) speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE). ResultsMean fibrosis stage and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) scores were 1.31.1 and 5.2 +/- 1.6, respectively. NAFLD patients displayed decreased RV function compared to controls. NAFLD patients with liver fibrosis (67 patients) had significantly lower RV function assessed by GLS (global longitudinal strain) compared to patients without liver fibrosis (18.9 +/- 3.4% vs. 21.6 +/- 2.3%, P<0.001). NASH score 5 was associated with lower RV-GLS (18.9 +/- 3.1% vs. 21.0 +/- 3.4%, P=0.006). NASH score inversely correlated with RV-GLS (r=-0.370, P<0.001) such as patients with impaired RV-GLS (<19%) showed significantly higher NASH score compared to normal RV-GLS group (5.8 +/- 1.4 vs. 4.8 +/- 1.7, P=0.009). Logistic regression analysis revealed that NASH score was an independent predictor of impaired RV function in patients with NAFLD. ConclusionsPatients with NAFLD have impaired RV function. NASH score inversely correlates with RV-GLS and independently predicts impaired RV function in patients with NAFLD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据