4.2 Article

Design of Curcumin Loaded Polymeric Nanoparticles-Optimization, Formulation and Characterization

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 16, 期 9, 页码 9432-9442

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2016.12363

关键词

Curcumin; Nanoparticles; MIVM; Simple Precipitation; CMCAB; Rapid Precipitation

资金

  1. UGC, New Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of Curcumin for treatment of diseases like colon cancer, pancreatic cancer, arthritis and Alzheimer's disease has become the area of growing interest. It has a low intrinsic toxicity and magnificent properties like anti-inflammatory, anti-mutagenic, anti-oxidant, with comparatively lesser side-effects. However, because of its poor solubility, low absorption and poor bioavailability, they are not efficient to be used for clinical purposes. Formation of nanoparticles proved very much promising to increase absorption and bioavailability, leading to the effective drug administration. In this study curcumin encapsulated polymeric nanoparticles are prepared to enhance bioavailability of the hydrophobic drug. Two methods of preparation of nanoparticles are explored (a) a conventional precipitation method and (b) rapid precipitation method using Multi Inlet Vortex Mixer (MIVM). The particles from both the methods are purified using rotavap and dried by hot-air oven or lyophilizer. Nanoparticles with well-defined properties were obtained using MIVM. An optimization study was done to obtain desired particle size. Dynamic light scattering showed the particle sizes were between 150-400 nm. The Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) results showed that the drug in the nanoparticles was in the amorphous state. From the analysis, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), stability and intactness of entrapped drug in the nanoparticles was shown. The drug loading in the nanoparticles was in the range of 19-23 wt%. The drug from the nanoparticle showed higher solubility compared to the pure as-received drug.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据