3.8 Article

TISSUE PROCESSING AND ISOLATION OF TUMOR CELLS FROM HUMAN COLORECTAL CANCER TISSUE

期刊

出版社

DOKUZ EYLUL UNIV INST HEALTH SCIENCES
DOI: 10.30621/jbachs.1154867

关键词

colorectal cancer; chemical dissociation; cancer cell isolation

资金

  1. Dokuz Eylul University, Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit
  2. [2018.KB.SAG.039]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the cellular biology and physiology of colon cancer tissues in in vitro. The results showed that isolating cells from larger and non-necrotic tumor tissues resulted in better growth patterns for 3D cultures. Size and presence of necrotic areas were found to be important factors affecting the viability of cancer cells.
Purpose: To investigate of cellular biology and physiology of colon cancer tissues in in vitro requires viable dissociation of single cells. The amount of tissue and dissociation methods can affect the amount of single cell viability. Inadequate initial tissue has negative effects on experiment quality by resulting in insufficient quality and the number of cells.Material and Methods: In the context of this study different-weigh and different-textured colon tumor tissues have been evaluated to emphasize the importance of initial tissue properties during the operation of tissue processing and cell isolation success. Effect of the necrotic areas is also evaluated with the isolated viable cells number and the success of three-dimensional (3D) primary culture.Results: Elevated weight of the tissue resulted with more total isolated cells. Necrotic tissues caused low percentage of viable cells. Since resected tissues were bigger than biopsy samples, resected tissues derived primary 3D culture were succesfully maintained the culture.Conclusion: To conclude, isolated cells from the bigger and non-necrotic tumor tissues showed better growth pattern for 3D cultures. On the other hand, size was found as a crucial parameter for obtaining more viable cancer cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据