3.8 Article

EFFECTS OF CHROMOSOMAL TRANSLOCATIONS ON SPERM COUNT IN AZOOSPERMIC AND OLIGOSPERMIC CASES

期刊

出版社

DOKUZ EYLUL UNIV INST HEALTH SCIENCES
DOI: 10.30621/jbachs.1069678

关键词

Azospermia; oligospermia; reciprocal; robertsonian

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the effect of chromosome break areas on sperm count in 16 male patients with reciprocal or Robertsonian translocation. A total of 21 chromosomal breakpoints were identified in the 11 patients with reciprocal translocations, potentially contributing to the clarification of ambiguous issues related to spermatogenesis and sperm maturation. The importance of genetic counseling in patients with translocations was also highlighted.
Purpose: A number of mechanisms have been proposed for the effect of chromosomal translocations on spermatogenesis and sperm maturation. However, there are still numerous ambiguous issues regarding these two processes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of chromosome break areas on sperm count in the light of the literature. Material and Methods: The study was conducted on the data of 16 male patients with reciprocal or Robertsonian translocation among 152 patients who were admitted to Adana Numune Training and Research Hospital and Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital Genetic Diagnosis Centers between 2013 and 2016 due to azoospermia and oligospermia. Results: 11 of these patients had reciprocal and five patients had Robertsonian translocations. All the patients with Robertsonian translocations were detected with azoospermia. Of the patients with reciprocal translocation, five of them were azoospermic and six of them were severe oligospermic. Conclusion: A total of 21 chromosomal breakpoints were identified in the 11 patients with reciprocal translocations. These chromosomal breakpoints may contribute to the clarification of ambiguous issues related to spermatogenesis and sperm maturation. The results also showed the importance of genetic counselling in patients with translocations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据