4.6 Article

Biologically active Schiff bases containing thiophene/furan ring and their copper(II) complexes: Synthesis, spectral, nonlinear optical and density functional studies

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1120, 期 -, 页码 259-266

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2016.05.002

关键词

Thiophene/furan aldehyde; Schiff base; DFT method; NLO; Antibacterial activity

资金

  1. Gazi University [05/2007-09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Schiff bases; 1,8-bis(thiophene-2-carboxaldimine)-p-menthane (L-1) and 1,8-bis(furan-2-carboxaldimine)-p-menthane (L-2) have been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, H-1-C-13 NMR, UV-vis, FT-IR and LC-MS methods. H-1 and C-13 shielding tensors for L-1 and L-2 were calculated with GIAO/DFT/B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) methods in CDCl3. The vibrational band assignments, nonlinear optical (NLO) activities, frontier molecular orbitals (FMOs) and absorption spectrum have been investigated by the same basis set. Schiff base-copper(II) complexes have been synthesized and structurally characterized with spectroscopic methods, magnetic and conductivity measurements. The spectroscopic data suggest that Schiff base ligands coordinate through azomethine-N and thiophene-S/furan-O donors (as SNNS and ONNO chelating systems) to give a tetragonal geometry around the copper(II) ions. Schiff bases and Cu(II) complexes have been screened for their biological activities on different species of pathogenic bacteria, those are, Gram positive bacteria: Bacillus subtitilus, Yersinia enterotica, Bacillus cereus, Listeria monocytogenes, Micrococcus luteus and Gram negative bacteria: Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeroginosa, Shigella dysenteriae, Salmonella typhi, Kiebsiella pseudomonas by using microdilution technique (MIC values in mM). Biological activity results show that Cu(II) complexes have higher activities than parent ligands and metal chelation may affect significantly the antibacterial behavior of the organic ligands. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据